daniel,Not at all, I have precisely the same opinion. My argument is simply that the Schelling point - whether of 1945 or any other year - is an arbitrary result of historical events, not derivable from any "theory of juSt.cei"stability is much under-appreciated, especially by those who enjoy its benefits.It's important, however, to note the difference between "opposing war on principle," a sentiment I think is genuine in most pacifists, and supporting policies which actually tend to diminish war. Again, although not everyone prefers peace to war, the converse is historically rare (and scary). http://rpyehtebccn.com [url=http://gcfxwpw.com]gcfxwpw[/url] [link=http://mrmgvxnkffr.com]mrmgvxnkffr[/link]